Clean Coal Technologies

Resolution Category Provincial Scope 6
Subject Economic
Year 2016
Status Adopted - Expired
Sponsor - Mover
Forestburg, Village of
Active Clauses

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Alberta Urban Municipalities Association urge the Province of Alberta to allow continued operation of coal fired power plants while allowing industry to explore and develop methods of clean coal burning and alternate markets for coal.

Whereas Clauses

WHEREAS the Provincial Government’s announcement in November, 2015 to accelerate the phase out all coal fired power generating plants will have significant impact on those rural communities adjacent to the power plants;

WHEREAS the coal mines and the power generating stations employ significant numbers of personnel and support many local businesses, the loss of those facilities will be detrimental to the sustainability of the rural communities;

WHEREAS the Provincial Government has not offered the option to the coal and power generation industries to research methods for reducing the emissions caused by these coal fired plants;

WHEREAS alternate methods of utilizing coal to produce electricity with reduced emissions are being used in other provinces and countries at this time;

WHEREAS coal is a valuable natural resource available in abundance in Alberta and the Provincial Government should be supportive of exploring alternate uses or methods of refining this resource.

Resolution Background

Coal is used as the source of power generation for up to 55% of Alberta’s power needs. There is an abundant supply of coal in Alberta and the technology exists to burn it with fewer emissions. Even with wind and solar developments, there must be an "on demand" supply that will replace it when those renewable sources of electricity do not produce.  Wind only produces 30% of the time while solar is limited to 15% of the time. While natural gas is promoted as a replacement, it is subject to wild price fluctuations.  This would tie us to one source for both our heating and electrical needs, which, during a price spike, would severely impact everyone, but most dramatically the poor who can least afford it.

Coal has proven to be the most economical method of producing electricity in areas that do not have access to hydro power.  The loss of this commodity and the introduction of a carbon levy on natural gas will cause a significant spike in the cost of electricity to the end user.  Countries that had previously decided to phase out coal fired power generation are now opening up new sites as the cost of utilizing renewable energy is too expensive and the reliability of renewable energy does not meet the standards set by coal.

Since 1956, Forestburg has been closely tied to the Battle River Generating Station, a coal fired power plant capable of producing 689 megawatts of power.  The generating station and the affiliated coal mine provide many jobs in the Forestburg and surrounding areas.

The loss of these corporations will greatly affect our communities. Not only do they provide employment and livelihood for our residents, they have assisted financially with many of our local projects, the most recent being a new multi-purpose arena.  Furthermore, they are a source of donations and volunteers to other organizations such as our volunteer fire department, library, and swimming pool, to name a few.  These sites also provide work to local support businesses, such as welders, contractors, tradespeople and commercial businesses.  All of these will be negatively impacted by the impending shut down.

The loss of employment to our residents could be catastrophic to our communities.  There are few local employment opportunities available for the displaced workers.  The loss of these families will affect enrolment in our school, our volunteer base, and our business base. 

Forestburg recognizes that environmental stewardship should be a high priority for all of us, but we do feel that decisions made must be tempered with local needs as well.  The cost of shutting down the Battle River Generating Station could be devastating to our region and will impact not only Forestburg, but also our municipal neighbours including Flagstaff County, Paintearth County, County of Stettler, Camrose County, Village of Heisler, Town of Daysland and the hamlet of Galahad.  All of these communities either house workers or businesses that support the plant and mine.

Rural municipalities struggle to survive and the decision to shut down all coal fired plants without attempting to look at ways to ensure that these plants are viable, both economically and environmentally, is very short sighted.  The ultimate cost may be more than our province and citizens can afford.

There is an opportunity for Alberta to become a leader in the development of the clean burning of coal, which would allow us to meet the province’s emissions goals while not negatively impacting the ability of small rural communities to remain sustainable.

Government Response

Alberta Energy-November 2016

Eliminating emissions from coal is the right to do for Albertans' health and the environment. If new technology is developed to produce zero pollution from coal, it could be considered once again as a feasible option for electricity generation. The government is committed to a ransition that will help ensure consumers and taxpayers are protected, communities and workers are supported, and companies and investors are treated fairly.

Alberta Municipalities notes

AUMA rejects this response and provided a follow up letter to Alberta Energy in February 2016 that:

- Reiterated AUMA's desire to partner with the Government of Alberta to help municipalities and their residents transition to a low carbon future, particularly in those communities most reliant on coal-fired generation for employment.

-  Urged the province to consider each coal-fired generating facility on a case-by-case basis. For example, facilities such as Keephills 3 or Genesee 3, which use supercritical technology and deliver greater fuel efficiency and lower emissions, should be allowed to remain in operation. In cases where a facility does not meet these standards, the province should provide assistance for the affected communities to ensure they are sustainable and viable after facility closure. This could be achieved through dedicating a portion of the carbon levy to transition supports for communities whose economies are dependent on high carbon industries.